To: PaybackIsABitch 你曾经说:贴出来了
纽约海明律师:莫虎的马甲真能造谣,说我今天上交给法庭的71号文件是旧的文件,再交一次。71 号文件是我今天从早写到晚上6点半,才写完的。好得不得了。是赢下这几个动议的关键。有爱好者可以到法庭的网站上去下载,看看我写得好不好。
----------------------------------------
等艾艾把海胖胖的71号文贴出来。胖胖说他写得“好得不得了”:) :) :)
To: lawandorder 你曾经说:谢谢您的解答。也加到文末了。
Your question shows that you know very little, if anything, about “supplemental jurisdiction.“ Before a federal court exercise its “supplemental jurisdiction“ over a party, the court must first have “original jurisdiction.“ (See 28 U.S.C. § 1367. Supplemental jurisdiction.) The only basis for the court‘s original jurisdiction over Zhou Li Bo if he is added as a party in this action is diversit
To: 他乡风云 你曾经说:Your question shows that you know very little, if anything, about “supplemental jurisdiction.“ Before a federal court exercise its “supplemental jurisdiction“ over a party, the court must first have “original jurisdiction.“ (See 28 U.S.C. § 1367. Supplemental jurisdiction.) The only basis for the court‘s original jurisdiction over Zhou Li Bo if he is added as a party in this action is diversity under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Because there is no diversity, the court does not have original jurisdiction and the issue of “supplemental jurisdiction“ is irrelevant.
What about “supplemental jurisdiction“?
To: 何哲 你曾经说:何哲先生:多谢鼓励。您的作品也都是重量级,都直接击中要害。Lawandorder
Lawandorder先生智慧很高,精通法律,总是一针扎在穴上。网友们学到法律知识,受益匪浅。谢谢Lawandorder先生。
To: 他乡风云 你曾经说:他乡风云:这句话是观点性评论,是基于直接感受和法律判断。如果有人因为你的某评论或观点要起诉你诽谤 (比如前两天你说Pollyzixin 的文章是恶毒攻击等),然后在中文网上(或者其他大众媒体)声称,要你到某律师办公室去取诉状(summons and complaint), 不按照纽约州严格的送达诉状的法律运作,我的直接感受和法律判断就是你已经在法律程序上受到了这个潜在原告人的“虐待和侮辱。” (很抱歉最后这句话中文不很通顺,但意思应该很清楚。)
这话从何说起,根据那条?
------原告在法律程序上对周立波已进行了虐待和侮辱(abuse and insult)
如果中文不便,直接写英语吧。
To: 他乡风云 你曾经说:回去好好研究你的马甲问题,写出一篇有点水平的马甲文字,然后再来请教法律问题,啊。
你真的以为他/她是律师?这局话露馅了:
原告在法律程序上对周立波已进行了虐待和侮辱(abuse and insult)。
To: 他乡风云 你曾经说:回去好好研究你的马甲问题,写出一篇有点水平的马甲文字,然后再来请教法律问题,啊。
你真的以为他/她是律师?这局话露馅了:
原告在法律程序上对周立波已进行了虐待和侮辱(abuse and insult)。
To: 何哲 你曾经说:你真的以为他/她是律师?这局话露馅了:
Lawandorder先生智慧很高,精通法律,总是一针扎在穴上。网友们学到法律知识,受益匪浅。谢谢Lawandorder先生。