笑死人了。黄晓夫律师原来是个性侵儿童犯。世界日报曾经以“一罪三罚”报道黄晓夫在新泽西萎谢幼女,一罪三罚的新闻。刑事处罚,新州和纽约律师公会处罚,所以是三罚。黄晓夫气得状告“世界日报”,输了。黄晓夫又上诉,又输了。WONG v. WORLD JOURNAL
1 A.D.3d 222 (2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 227
RAYMOND H. WONG et al., Appellants,v.WORLD JOURNAL, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
November 18, 2003.
Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.
The complaint was properly dismissed for lack of evidence sufficient to raise an issue of fact as to whether defendant-respondent was grossly irresponsible in publishing the offending article (see Gaeta v New York News,62 N.Y.2d 340, 345 [1984]). We have considered and rejected plaintiffs‘ other claims.